中频栏目
低频栏目
审稿时间:暂无参考数据,审稿时间不确定!
见刊周期:-
温馨提示:以上只是参考信息,实际情况会根据投稿主题、稿件质量和数量、审稿流程有所差异。想获得更准确信息请联系期刊的编辑部进行咨询。
1、投稿方式:在线投稿。
2、官网网址:
http://journal.hep.com.cn/fem
https://link.springer.com/journal/42524
3、投稿系统:
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/fem
4、官网邮箱:
fem@hust.edu.cn
huanghj@hep.com.cn
5、官网电话:
027-87540191;010-58556289
(更多电话邮箱详见官网信息)
6、出刊日期:季刊,逢季末月出版。
7、官方微信公众号:工程管理前沿
8、微信公众号信息:《Frontiers of Engineering Management》将于2026年起正式更名为《ENGINEERING Management》(《工程·管理(英文)》)。
2025年12月24日星期三
Guidelines for authors
【官网信息】
Frontiers of Engineering Management
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
August 1, 2023
General information
Frontiers
of Engineering Management (FEM), supervised by the Chinese Academy of
Engineering, administered by Chinese Academy of Engineering, Higher
Education Press, Tsinghua University and Huazhong University of Science
and Technology and published jointly by Higher Education Press and
Springer Nature in English in both print and online versions quarterly,
provides a high quality international platform for the academicians,
researchers and professionals in the broad field of engineering
management to impart and share knowledge newly advanced and created, in
the four main forms of research article, review, comments, and super
engineering.
Types of Articles
The following types of articles can be submitted to the journal:
RESEARCH ARTICLE: Original research report.
REVIEW:
An in-depth overview of certain topic or a review of the author’s own
work or the work of one research group. The format and length of review
articles are more flexible than a full article.
COMMENTS:
A discussion/remark on an article, a view point, a book, etc. It should
be within 1000–1500 words. In this case, the authors are allowed to
respond to any comments.
SUPER ENGINEERING: An introduction to mega projects focusing on technological innovation and management innovation.
Duplicate/previous publication or submission
Manuscripts
submitted to this journal must not be under simultaneous consideration
by any other publisher and should not have been published elsewhere in
substantially similar form. No part of a paper which has been published
by Frontiers of Engineering Management may be reproduced or published
elsewhere without the written permission of the publisher.
Ethical responsibilities of authors
This
journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific
record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the
journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential
acts of misconduct.
Authors
should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage
the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor.
Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be
achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which
includes:
● The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
●
The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full),
unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please
provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of
text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)).
A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the
quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one
journal over time (e.g., “salami-publishing”).
● No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions.
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the
authors own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must
be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim),
summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim
copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is
copyrighted.
Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.
Consent to submit has been received from all co-authors and responsible
authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been
carried out before the work is submitted.
Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed
sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective
responsibility and accountability for the results.
In addition:
● Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.
Requests to add or delete authors at revision stage or after
publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after
receipt of written approval from all authors and detailed explanation
about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision on
accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.
Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation
or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in
the form of raw data, samples, records, etc.
If
there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an
investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation,
the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be
contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct
has been proven, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation
of the following measures, including but not limited to:
- If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
-
If the article has already been published online, depending on the
nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed
with the article, or, in severe cases complete retraction of the article
will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or
retraction note.
- The author’s institution may be informed.
Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest
are requested to disclose interests that are directly or indirectly
related to the work submitted for publication. Interests within the last
3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing
the work for submission) should be reported. Interests outside the
3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be
perceived as influencing the submitted work. Disclosure of interests
provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their
own judgments of potential bias. This is not meant to imply that a
financial relationship with an organization that sponsored the research
or compensation received for consultancy work is inappropriate.
Editorial
Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing
interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a
competing interest exists. In addition, they should exclude themselves
from handling manuscripts in cases where there is a competing interest.
This may include – but is not limited to – having previously published
with one or more of the authors, and sharing the same institution as one
or more of the authors. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on
the author list they must declare this in the competing interests
section on the submitted manuscript. If they are an author or have any
other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another Editor
or member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to assume
responsibility for overseeing peer review. These submissions are subject
to the exact same review process as any other manuscript. Editorial
Board Members are welcome to submit papers to the journal. These
submissions are not given any priority over other manuscripts, and
Editorial Board Member status has no bearing on editorial consideration.
journal also publishes special/guest-edited issues. The peer review
process for these articles is the same as the peer review process of the
journal in general. Additionally, if the guest editor(s) authors an
article in their special issue, they will not handle the peer review
process.
Interests that should be considered and disclosed but are not limited to the following:
Funding: Research grants from funding agencies (please give the
research funder and the grant number) and/or research support (including
salaries, equipment, supplies, reimbursement for attending symposia,
and other expenses) by organizations that may gain or lose financially
through publication of this manuscript.
Employment: Recent (while engaged in the research project), present or
anticipated employment by any organization that may gain or lose
financially through publication of this manuscript. This includes
multiple affiliations (if applicable).
Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings
of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through
publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of
remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially;
patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by
publication of this manuscript.
It
is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial interest
becomes significant, any such figure is necessarily arbitrary, so one
possible practical guideline is the following: “Any undeclared financial
interest that could embarrass the author were it to become publicly
known after the work was published”.
Non-financial interests: In addition, authors are requested to disclose
interests that go beyond financial interests that could impart bias on
the work submitted for publication such as professional interests,
personal relationships or personal beliefs (amongst others). Examples
include, but are not limited to: position on editorial board, advisory
board or board of directors or other type of management relationships;
writing and/or consulting for educational purposes; expert witness;
mentoring relations; and so forth.
Primary
research articles require a disclosure statement. Review articles
present an expert synthesis of evidence and may be treated as an
authoritative work on a subject. Review articles therefore require a
disclosure statement. Other article types such as editorials, comments
(amongst others) may, dependent on their content, require a disclosure
statement. If you are unclear whether your article type requires a
disclosure statement, please contact the Editor-in-Chief.
Please
note that, in addition to the above requirements, funding information
(given that funding is a potential competing interest (as mentioned
above)) needs to be disclosed upon submission of the manuscript in the
peer review system. This information will automatically be added to the
Record of CrossMark, however it is not added to the manuscript itself.
Under “summary of requirements” (see below) funding information should
be included in the “Declarations” section.
......
更多详见:
https://journal.hep.com.cn/fem/EN/CMS/guidelines/1160153046377041990