中频栏目
审稿时间:暂无参考数据,审稿时间不确定!
见刊周期:-
温馨提示:以上只是参考信息,实际情况会根据投稿主题、稿件质量和数量、审稿流程有所差异。想获得更准确信息请联系期刊的编辑部进行咨询。
1、该刊只有国际刊号。
2、投稿方式:在线投稿。
3、官网网址:
https://caer.cau.edu.cn/
https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer
4、投稿系统:
https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/caer
5、主办单位相关网址:
https://www.cau.edu.cn/xkky/xsky/xxzb/index.htm
(中国农业大学学术期刊)
6、官网电话:010-62738685
7、官网邮箱:caer@cau.edu.cn
8、出刊日期:季刊,一年出版4期。
9、官网微信公众号:CAER编辑部
2026年1月29日星期四
Author guidelines
【官网信息】
Before you start
For
queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision, please
contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For queries post
acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project Manager. These details
can be found in the Editorial Team section.
Author responsibilities
Our
goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous experience at
each stage of the review and publication process. There are also some
responsibilities that sit with you as the author. Our expectation is
that you will:
Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication process.
Be
accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes investigating
and resolving any questions about accuracy or research integrity.
Treat communications between you and the journal editor as confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
Read about our research ethics for authorship. These state that you must:
Include
anyone who has made a substantial and meaningful contribution to the
submission (anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the
acknowledgements).
Exclude anyone who hasn’t contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be associated with the research.
In
accordance with COPE’s position statement on AI tools, Large Language
Models cannot be credited with authorship as they are incapable of
conceptualising a research design without human direction and cannot be
accountable for the integrity, originality, and validity of the
published work. The author(s) must describe the content created or
modified as well as appropriately cite the name and version of the AI
tool used; any additional works drawn on by the AI tool should also be
appropriately cited and referenced. Standard tools that are used to
improve spelling and grammar are not included within the parameters of
this guidance. The Editor and Publisher reserve the right to determine
whether the use of an AI tool is permissible.
If
your article involves human participants, you must ensure you have
considered whether or not you require ethical approval for your
research, and include this information as part of your submission. Find
out more about informed consent.
Emerald’s Policy on AI Usage
Emerald’s overarching principles of AI usage:
1) Authors and peer reviewers are responsible and accountable for the accuracy and integrity of their work.&
2) AI tools and technology must be used responsibly and transparently.
3) AI tools and technology should not replace human involvement in the publication process but instead supplement it.
Copywriting
(creating, drafting, or writing) any part of a submission using
generative AI tools and technology to generate new material is not
permitted.
Copy-editing
(correcting, editing, formatting, modifying, or refining) all or part
of an author’s own original existing work using generative AI tools and
technology the content to improve its structure and the clarity of the
language and grammar is permitted, ensuring users adhere to the
following overarching principles.
Emerald’s full policy, including examples of use cases can be found on our Publishing Ethics page.
Research and publishing ethics
editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we publish is
ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we closely follow the
advice laid out in the guidelines and flowcharts on the COPE (Committee
on Publication Ethics) website.
We
have also developed our research and publishing ethics guidelines. If
you haven’t already read these, we urge you to do so – they will help
you avoid the most common publishing ethics issues.
A few key points:
Any
manuscript you submit to this journal should be original. That means it
should not have been published before in its current, or similar, form.
Exceptions to this rule are outlined in our pre-print and conference
paper policies. If any substantial element of your paper
has been previously published, you need to declare this to the journal
editor upon submission. Please note, the journal editor may use Crossref
Similarity Check to check on the originality of submissions received.
This service compares submissions against a database of 49 million works
from 800 scholarly publishers.
Your
work should not have been submitted elsewhere and should not be under
consideration by any other publication.Failure to comply with this may
result in your work being desk-rejected by the journal editorial office.
you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon submission;
this allows the editor to decide how they would like to proceed. Read
about conflict of interest in our research and publishing ethics
guidelines.
By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing that the work is not in infringement of any existing copyright.
you have written about a company/individual/organisation in detail
using information that is not publicly available, have spent time within
that company/organisation, or the work features named/interviewed
employees, you will need to clear permission by using the consent to
publish form; please also see our permissions guidance for full details.
If you have to clear permission with the
company/individual/organisation, consent must be given either by the
named individual in question or their representative, a board member of
the company/organisation, or a HR department representative of the
company/organisation.
You
have an ethical obligation and responsibility to conduct your research
in adherence to national and international research ethics guidelines,
as well as the ethical principles outlined by your discipline and any
relevant authorities, and to be transparent about your research methods
in such a way that all involved in the publication process may fairly
and appropriately evaluate your work. For all research involving human
participants, you must ensure that you have obtained informed consent,
meaning that you must inform all participants in your work (or their
legal representative) as to why the research is being conducted, whether
their anonymity is protected, how their data will be stored and used,
and whether there are any associated risks from participation in the
study; the submitted work must confirm that informed consent was
obtained and detail how this was addressed in accordance with our policy
on informed consent.
Where
appropriate, you must provide an ethical statement within the submitted
work confirming that your research received institutional and national
(or international) ethical approval, and that it complies with all
relevant guidelines and regulations for studies involving humans,
whether that be data, individuals, or samples. Specifically, the
statement should contain the name and location of the institutional
ethics reviewing committee or review board, the approval number, the
date of approval, and the details of the national or international
guidelines that were followed, as well as any other relevant
information. You should also include details of how the work adheres to
relevant consent guidelines along with confirming that informed consent
was secured for all participants. The details of these statements should
ensure that author and participant anonymity is not compromised. Any
work submitted without a suitable ethical statement and details of
informed consent for all participants, where required, will be returned
to the authors and will not be considered further until appropriate and
clear documentation is provided. Emerald reserves the right to reject
work without sufficient evidence of informed consent from human
participants and ethical approval where required.
......
更多详见:
https://www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/journal/caer?id=caer#editorial-team