接accept1007 评论了 Games and Culture《游戏与文化》

2025/10/23 17:06:46

9.23投稿,近一个月一直停留在peer review,10.22忍不住发邮件问了进度,结果10.23立马接到主编拒信,建议转投或者投稿会议: This is interesting work that could have a good home in another journal or context. We wish you good luck and hope you will find a suitable home for your paper. We"d recommend presenting the paper at a suitable conference such as the upcoming DIGRA to gain additional peer feedback or try the journals ‘Games and Simulation’ or ‘Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds’.

0
0
0

投稿到接受大概一年,很好的刊物,编辑很好,评审专家所提的意见也很中肯,祝期刊越办越好

0
1
0
  • 小麦老师

    也在关注这本SSCI。请分享一下审稿进度?First Decision几天?Revision几个月?Accepted几个月?APC多少刀?谢谢!

    2025/10/16 22:49:51 0

skyscanner1356 评论了 Orbis Litterarum《世界文学》

2025/10/13 15:56:11

2025.10.10投稿,2025.10.12 under review,开贴追踪下

0
0
0

已投

0
0
0

TomSmith2022 评论了 Religions《宗教》

2025/9/24 16:25:17

9.22投稿,第二天进入pending editor decision 状态至今。等后续再看。

0
1
0
  • 非写不可吗

    没戏了,这大概是拒稿的信号,以我投了三次的经验

    2025/10/5 19:12:29 0

剑桥主办的ssci,分区稳定在Q1/Q2。两位外审专家提出的意见虽不多,但都切中肯綮,直指文章软肋,修改起来倍感困难。主编也会亲自提出修改建议,颇具启发性。总体来说有一定难度。

0
0
0

九九嘿 评论了 Games and Culture《游戏与文化》

2025/9/18 16:04:40

女性主义

处理速度很快,投稿第二天就拒稿了,感觉是模板回复: Dear Author: Thank you for your submission to Games and Culture. As there is a high volume of high-quality manuscripts submitted to Games and Culture, we must often turn away papers that might be publishable but which we do not have sufficient space for. We are still a paper-based journal where space is therefore limited. We wish you good luck and hope you will find a suitable home for your paper. We"d recommend presenting the paper at a suitable conference such as the upcoming DIGRA to gain additional peer feedback or try the journals ‘Games and Simulation’ or ‘Journal of Virtual Worlds’. Thank you again for your submission. I hope that you will consider Games and Culture as an outlet for future research.

0
0
0

云淡风轻 评论了 Journal of Religion & Health《宗教与健康杂志》

2025/9/17 16:25:13

垃圾期刊!投了两篇,至今一年多了,找不到审稿人,也不回复!

0
0
0

似乎已被踢出AHCI

官网的目录收录里已经没有了AHCI,请谨慎投稿,毕竟版面费大两万

0
0
0

内有闽犬狺狺狂吠 评论了 British Journal for the History of Philosophy《英国哲学史杂志》

2025/9/8 0:15:32

哲学史

不愧为哲学史顶刊,非常之丝滑。BJHP确实如其口碑一般极少desk reject,基本文章都会送外审。初审2.5个月,2个审稿人。返修复审一般1个月见分晓。值得注意的是这个刊物返修有可能会送给第3个审稿人。我被送了第3个审稿人,但最后接收的时候并没有第3人的评论。可能是该刊物常规操作。虽然这个刊物流程很丝滑,但它的命中率很低,只有7%左右,很看文章质量。

0
0
0
1234567...共 178 条