雕兄带带我 评论了 Modern Theology《现代神学》
2026/10/31 9:41:56
审稿（初审+匿名评审）三个半月后退稿，退稿决定有邮件回复，但不清楚为何看不到匿名评审意见。
HANNY 评论了 Religions《宗教》
2026/10/28 17:45:40
中古讲经；敦煌文献
方向和特刊特別契合，询问特刊客座编辑后回复非常好，结果投出去直接被DESK reject 此刊目前投稿量巨大，听说桌拒量能达到百分之八十五，希望有信息的学友可以谈谈。
lovefwritting 评论了 JNT-Journal of Narrative Theory《叙事理论学刊》
2026/10/27 14:36:14
定格动画的复杂叙事
由于之前投稿给SAGE的Animation期刊被拒稿，推荐我投稿给叙事学一类的期刊，于是我再次回归JNT。此前我投过，你们也可以在其他点评中找到我之前的留言。这本期刊算是很良心的。我10月20日投稿，26日进入with editor状态。和之前一样，他们审核的速度很快。目前我在等待，看看对方是否送审。之前的经验就是，你如果把研究限定到很小，很细节的范围，反而容易被考虑发表。否则，我上次就是，观点过新，对方涉及到为你的理论背书，因此最终哪怕我修改三次也不会发表你的稿子的。这次我的范围很小，所以再试试看。
C刊虐我千百遍 评论了 Perspectives-Studies in Translation Theory and Practice《视角: 翻译理论与实践研究》
2026/10/26 23:21:10
头铁试了试水，退稿理由跟楼下大差不差
C刊虐我千百遍 评论了 Across Languages and Cultures《跨语言与文化》
2026/10/26 23:18:06
隔天就退稿了，理由是主题不是很符合，外加来稿很多we are receiving far more manuscripts than we can consider, we have to select only the manuscripts that are of major interest to our readers
咖喱GiaoGiao 评论了 Religions《宗教》
2026/10/24 14:06:26
以前投过一篇，三天桌拒。这次投了一篇，一天送审，一周返小修，小修后ped，三天直接录用，速度像坐了火箭!
本是后山人 评论了 Adaptation-The Journal of Literature on Screen Studies《改编：银幕研究文学杂志》
2026/10/23 15:38:07
《济公》
难度非常大，一周内退稿，理由：Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Adaptation. I am afraid that we have to decline it at the desk rather than sending it out for review. The central difficulty is one of fit. The essay is at heart a reception history of a performer and a legend, and the adaptation-theoretical proposal it advances is applied illustratively rather than tested; the framework is never put under pressure, and no case is shown in which it delivers a judgment that existing approaches could not. For a journal read primarily by adaptation scholars, that imbalance is decisive. Related to this, the engagement with adaptation studies is thin where it needs to be thick: the field"s leading figures are characterized in a sentence or two and set aside. The intervention consequently reads as a proposal to import a vocabulary rather than a demonstration that existing vocabularies fail. The evidentiary base also has a methodological issue. Because the essay is about how traditions generate multiple origin stories, the commemorative record it provides needs more caution than it currently shows.
本是后山人 评论了 Extrapolation《外推法》
2026/10/23 15:33:58
中国一部科幻剧
别投了，编辑秒回说稿件积压成山，现在2028年那卷都快排满了，要不等两年后（不确定）再审，要不改投别的。
本是后山人 评论了 History of Religions《宗教史》
2026/10/23 10:23:50
明清宗教史
投稿三个月了，还是已提交状态，还没进入技术审查阶段，一点都不尊重作者的劳动成果。
